<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Foster &#187; IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benphoster.com/tag/it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benphoster.com</link>
	<description>Ben Foster on Digital Strategy, Social Media, and the Corner Office</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:05:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>3 Org Chart Structures for Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.benphoster.com/3-org-chart-structures-for-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benphoster.com/3-org-chart-structures-for-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Foster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leadership and Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benphoster.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve heard of Social Media being aligned in a bunch of different functions across the organization.  In a perfect world, Social Media is its own function with the leader reporting directly to the CEO.  But&#8230;we&#8217;re not quite there yet.  TheSocialOrganization.com had a great post about corporate initiatives being staffed in its own &#8220;function&#8221;, but until [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 30px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.benphoster.com%2F3-org-chart-structures-for-social-media%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.benphoster.com%2F3-org-chart-structures-for-social-media%2F&amp;source=benphoster&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-193" title="3orgchart" src="http://www.benphoster.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/3orgchart-300x234.jpg" alt="3orgchart" width="300" height="234" />I&#8217;ve heard of Social Media being aligned in a bunch of different functions across the organization.  In a perfect world, Social Media is its own function with the leader reporting directly to the CEO.  <a href="http://www.relationship-economy.com/?p=2412" target="_blank">But&#8230;we&#8217;re not quite there yet</a>.  <a href="http://www.thesocialorganization.com/2008/12/the-alignment-gap-between-organizational-structure-organizational-priorities.html" target="_blank">TheSocialOrganization.com had a great post</a> about corporate initiatives being staffed in its own &#8220;function&#8221;, but until we get there, here are 3 common approaches and their pros/cons.</p>
<h2>Marketing</h2>
<p><strong>Pros </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Easier to tie results to key business metrics (revenue, profit, brand awareness)</li>
<li>More natural fit for organization makes it easier to gain <a href="http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_07.htm" target="_blank">stakeholder buy-in</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_07.htm" target="_blank"><br />
</a><strong>Cons</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Can limit potential – initiatives focused on increasing sales</li>
<li>Customer perception of spam – <a href="http://www.searchengineguide.com/mack-collier/worst-example-of-a-company-twittering.php" target="_blank">lame company attempts at Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>Information Technology</h2>
<p><strong>Pros </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Easier to iterate/change technology applications</li>
<li>Employees with more experience in the space</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Over-engineered solutions that complicate content</li>
<li>Many tech departments aren’t known for being user-friendly</li>
</ul>
<h2>Strategy</h2>
<p><strong>Pros<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Provide longer-term, “big-bet” focus to the initiative</li>
<li>Able to apply value to multiple organization functions</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Can be focused too focused on “great thoughts” instead of quick action</li>
<li>Often balancing multiple strategic initiatives which could divert attention from Social Media</li>
</ul>
<p><a title="Download Slides here" href="http://www.benphoster.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/3-organizational-options-for-social-media.pdf">Download Slides Here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benphoster.com/3-org-chart-structures-for-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

