<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Foster &#187; forbes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benphoster.com/tag/forbes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benphoster.com</link>
	<description>Ben Foster on Digital Strategy, Social Media, and the Corner Office</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:05:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>No Forbes, CEOs should not &#8220;Facebook&#8221; or &#8220;Twitter&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.benphoster.com/no-forbes-ceos-should-not-facebook-or-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benphoster.com/no-forbes-ceos-should-not-facebook-or-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Foster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership and Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benphoster.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew Fraser and Soumitra Dutta write an ambiguous, bland, and wrong piece on Forbes.com about the need for CEOs to use Social Networking technologies.  Their seemingly decent argument cites Web 2.0 Evangelists (no one particular, just the &#8220;evangelists&#8221; in general) who apparently claim the following: Web 2.0 evangelists, on the other hand, argue that social [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 30px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.benphoster.com%2Fno-forbes-ceos-should-not-facebook-or-twitter%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.benphoster.com%2Fno-forbes-ceos-should-not-facebook-or-twitter%2F&amp;source=benphoster&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 136px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fncll/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/46/135465558_123402af8c.jpg" alt="" width="126" height="77" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo by ChrisL_Ak</p></div>
<p>Matthew Fraser and Soumitra Dutta write an <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/11/social-networking-executives-leadership-managing-facebook.html">ambiguous, bland, and wrong piece</a> on Forbes.com about the need for CEOs to use Social Networking technologies.  Their seemingly decent argument cites Web 2.0 Evangelists (no one particular, just the &#8220;evangelists&#8221; in general) who apparently claim the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>Web 2.0 evangelists, on the other hand, argue that social software can be used to boost productivity. They say it can facilitate an open-ended corporate culture that values transparency, collaboration and innovation. Most important, it can be an effective way to build a customer-centric organization that not only communicates authentically but also listens to customers and learns from that interaction.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course all this is true, but two of the examples they use, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/Blendtec">Blendtec CEO&#8217;s &#8220;Will it Blend&#8221; series</a>, and <a href="http://twitter.com/zappos">Zappo&#8217;s CEO Twitter Feed</a>, feel like a simple marketing channel.</p>
<p>Simply put, CEOs make a lot of money because they are good at managing talented people.</p>
<p><strong>Average CEO of an S&amp;P 500 company was $10.5 million in 2008</strong></p>
<p>Say whatever you want about <a href="http://www.faireconomy.org/files/executive_excess_2008.pdf">executive pay</a>&#8230;but CEOs have unique skills and are therefore highly compensated.  At $10.5 million a year, and assuming no sleep, that&#8217;s about $1,200 an hour.  Shareholders demand that CEOs should focus on what they do best&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>CEOs Would Need to Spend Many Hours Building Social Media Skills</strong></p>
<p>It takes a decent amount of experience to use this technology authentically without sounding artificial.  And, the only way to do this is &#8220;learning by doing&#8221;.  So, if anyone says, &#8220;It only takes a couple of seconds to Tweet&#8221;, remind them that the best Twitter users are ones that have practiced writing pithy updates.</p>
<p>Johnathan Schwartz is the rare example of a CEO who can do this, but I suspect there is some <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/">ghost-writing behind this blog</a>.</p>
<p><strong>The Best CEOs Hire People Who Are Smarter Than They Are</strong></p>
<p>Find a social media expert, <a href="http://www.benphoster.com/6-reasons-there-are-so-many-social-media-_____insert-title-here/">apparently they&#8217;re everywhere</a>.  But hire them and have them communicate to you like any other functional leader in your organization.  Find a strategic thinker who can drive change at all levels of the organization to impact your business objectives.  Don&#8217;t have a CEO spend their valuable time learning Social Media skills when they are experts in the much rarer skills of Management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benphoster.com/no-forbes-ceos-should-not-facebook-or-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

