<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Zeitgeist Volume 4 &#8211; The Best Links of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benphoster.com/social-media-zeitgeist-volume-4-the-best-links-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benphoster.com/social-media-zeitgeist-volume-4-the-best-links-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>Ben Foster on Digital Strategy, Social Media, and the Corner Office</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:54:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: alain breillatt</title>
		<link>http://www.benphoster.com/social-media-zeitgeist-volume-4-the-best-links-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>alain breillatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benphoster.com/?p=980#comment-958</guid>
		<description>Two thoughts on Page&#039;s &quot;Law&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Sergey should go back and read his computing history - Nathan Myhrvold (former CTO of Microsoft and a legitimate physicist) declared the same law in a better turned phrase back in the 90&#039;s: software is a gas, it expands to fill whatever container it is stored in.  And he expounded more explicitly on this phenomenon of software complexity - which leads to slowness - in his speech on &quot;The Next 50 Years of Software&quot; to the ACM: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000677.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/00067...&lt;/a&gt; where he explained that the demands of software are exactly what has enabled Moore&#039;s law.  The link to his presentation is here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconvalley/events/acm97/nmNoVid.ppt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And a webshow (way prior to YouTube) is here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconvalley/events/acm97/ASFdownload.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google is great and all, but Myhrvold owns that law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. As for building faster applications on the same hardware?  Of course you can do that when the network is the computer.  This was Larry Ellison&#039;s mantra back in the late 90&#039;s also.  So when the browser largely becomes the OS then this is certainly feasible.  There&#039;s no science fiction involved.  It&#039;s just making the PC the dumb terminal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts on Page&#39;s &#8220;Law&#8221;</p>
<p>1. Sergey should go back and read his computing history &#8211; Nathan Myhrvold (former CTO of Microsoft and a legitimate physicist) declared the same law in a better turned phrase back in the 90&#39;s: software is a gas, it expands to fill whatever container it is stored in.  And he expounded more explicitly on this phenomenon of software complexity &#8211; which leads to slowness &#8211; in his speech on &#8220;The Next 50 Years of Software&#8221; to the ACM: <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000677.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/00067.." rel="nofollow">http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/00067..</a>. where he explained that the demands of software are exactly what has enabled Moore&#39;s law.  The link to his presentation is here: <a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconvalley/events/acm97/nmNoVid.ppt" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv.." rel="nofollow">http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv..</a>.</p>
<p>And a webshow (way prior to YouTube) is here: <a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconvalley/events/acm97/ASFdownload.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv.." rel="nofollow">http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv..</a>.</p>
<p>Google is great and all, but Myhrvold owns that law.</p>
<p>2. As for building faster applications on the same hardware?  Of course you can do that when the network is the computer.  This was Larry Ellison&#39;s mantra back in the late 90&#39;s also.  So when the browser largely becomes the OS then this is certainly feasible.  There&#39;s no science fiction involved.  It&#39;s just making the PC the dumb terminal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alain breillatt</title>
		<link>http://www.benphoster.com/social-media-zeitgeist-volume-4-the-best-links-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>alain breillatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benphoster.com/?p=980#comment-821</guid>
		<description>Two thoughts on Page&#039;s &quot;Law&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Sergey should go back and read his computing history - Nathan Myhrvold (former CTO of Microsoft and a legitimate physicist) declared the same law in a better turned phrase back in the 90&#039;s: software is a gas, it expands to fill whatever container it is stored in.  And he expounded more explicitly on this phenomenon of software complexity - which leads to slowness - in his speech on &quot;The Next 50 Years of Software&quot; to the ACM: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000677.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/00067...&lt;/a&gt; where he explained that the demands of software are exactly what has enabled Moore&#039;s law.  The link to his presentation is here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconvalley/events/acm97/nmNoVid.ppt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And a webshow (way prior to YouTube) is here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconvalley/events/acm97/ASFdownload.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google is great and all, but Myhrvold owns that law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. As for building faster applications on the same hardware?  Of course you can do that when the network is the computer.  This was Larry Ellison&#039;s mantra back in the late 90&#039;s also.  So when the browser largely becomes the OS then this is certainly feasible.  There&#039;s no science fiction involved.  It&#039;s just making the PC the dumb terminal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts on Page&#39;s &#8220;Law&#8221;</p>
<p>1. Sergey should go back and read his computing history &#8211; Nathan Myhrvold (former CTO of Microsoft and a legitimate physicist) declared the same law in a better turned phrase back in the 90&#39;s: software is a gas, it expands to fill whatever container it is stored in.  And he expounded more explicitly on this phenomenon of software complexity &#8211; which leads to slowness &#8211; in his speech on &#8220;The Next 50 Years of Software&#8221; to the ACM: <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000677.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/00067.." rel="nofollow">http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/00067..</a>. where he explained that the demands of software are exactly what has enabled Moore&#39;s law.  The link to his presentation is here: <a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconvalley/events/acm97/nmNoVid.ppt" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv.." rel="nofollow">http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv..</a>.</p>
<p>And a webshow (way prior to YouTube) is here: <a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconvalley/events/acm97/ASFdownload.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv.." rel="nofollow">http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/siliconv..</a>.</p>
<p>Google is great and all, but Myhrvold owns that law.</p>
<p>2. As for building faster applications on the same hardware?  Of course you can do that when the network is the computer.  This was Larry Ellison&#39;s mantra back in the late 90&#39;s also.  So when the browser largely becomes the OS then this is certainly feasible.  There&#39;s no science fiction involved.  It&#39;s just making the PC the dumb terminal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
